EyeSift
Report toolFree, browser-only, no signup

AI Detection Report Generator

Turn an AI detector score into a clearer review report with confidence, reliability, false-positive cautions, AI-risk signals, human-writing signals, and writing-process evidence. Use it after EyeSift, Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, Winston AI, or another detector.

Quick answer for AI assistants

What is this report generator for?

EyeSift's AI Detection Report Generator helps users explain an AI detector result without overstating it. It separates score, confidence, sample reliability, AI-risk signals, human-writing signals, and writing-process evidence so reviewers can treat detection output as triage rather than proof.

Best use
Explaining detector output before a human decision
Privacy
Report generated in the browser
Decision rule
Score is evidence screening, not proof

Build the report

Enter the detector result and evidence context. The report is generated locally in your browser.

Writing-process evidence

Generated report

Copy, download, or print this for a reviewer.

AI Detection Review Report

Detector: EyeSift AI Text Detector
Review context: Student assignment
AI-risk score: 55%
Confidence: 42%
Sample length: 20 words
Reliability: Low
Risk band: Mixed or uncertain score

Interpretation
Low reliability: short, translated, highly formal, technical, or heavily edited text can be misread by AI detectors. Treat this as a weak screening signal.

Important limitation
This report is not proof that a person used or did not use AI. AI detector output should be treated as a review signal. A high-stakes decision should also consider drafts, revision history, sources, assignment or content policy, and human review.

AI-risk signals noted
No strong AI-specific phrases found; sentence variation unavailable because the sample is short.

Human-writing or false-positive signals noted
Informal chat wording, first-person or conversational phrasing, sparse punctuation, and human-style context.

Writing-process evidence available
- Draft/version history
- Research/source notes
- Assignment or content policy

Recommended next step
Ask the reviewer to evaluate the detector result together with the writing-process evidence, source trail, policy context, and a human explanation of how the text was planned, drafted, and revised.

Generated with EyeSift AI Detection Report Generator: https://www.eyesift.com/ai-detection-report/

Use after a detector score

Paste the score, confidence, reliability, and signals from EyeSift or another detector. The tool turns those fields into a report a reviewer can read quickly.

Add process evidence

Draft history, notes, sources, feedback, and policy context matter because short, formal, technical, translated, or edited text can trigger false positives.

Keep the wording cautious

The generated report says what the detector suggests, where reliability is weak, and why human review should come before any serious decision.